We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy on the information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to over the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can generate inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
Some pluralist systems, which include Scots law in Scotland and types of civil legislation jurisdictions in Quebec and Louisiana, never specifically in shape into the dual common-civil law system classifications. These types of systems may well have been greatly influenced because of the Anglo-American common law tradition; however, their substantive law is firmly rooted while in the civil regulation tradition.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this can be a free and democratic state, and once a person becomes a major he / she can marry whosoever he/she likes; if the parents of your boy or girl usually do not approve of these inter-caste or interreligious marriage the utmost they are able to do if they will Slice off social relations with the son or even the daughter, Nevertheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Lady that is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or gentleman who is a major, the few is neither harassed by any person nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who presents this kind of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence both himself or at his instigation, is taken to activity by instituting criminal proceedings because of the police against this kind of persons and further stern action is taken against these person(s) as provided by regulation.
The necessary analysis (called ratio decidendi), then constitutes a precedent binding on other courts; further analyses not strictly necessary for the determination of the current case are called obiter dicta, which represent persuasive authority but are not technically binding. By contrast, decisions in civil legislation jurisdictions are generally shorter, referring only to statutes.[4]
This is because transfer orders are typically regarded within the administrative discretion in the employer. However, there could be exceptions in cases where the transfer is motivated by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, they may have grounds to challenge before the right forum. Read more
As the Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has long been achieved, therefore the decision from the Supreme Court needs to generally be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) in the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
When the state court hearing the case reviews the law, he finds that, though it mentions large multi-tenant properties in certain context, it can be actually really vague about whether the ninety-working day provision applies to all landlords. The judge, based around the specific circumstances of Stacy’s case, decides that all landlords are held to the ninety-working day notice prerequisite, and rules in Stacy’s favor.
However it is actually made distinct that police is free to acquire action against any person that's indulged in criminal activities topic to legislation. However no harassment shall be caused to your petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of regulation. Police shall also ensure respect in the family lose in accordance with regulation and should they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they are able to act, so far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall safe concrete evidence and acquire necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate to be a issue of security of the house is concerned, which just isn't public place under the Act 1977. 9. Thinking of the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition has been realized. Consequently, this petition is hereby disposed of while in the terms stated higher than. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 40 Order Date: 08-APR-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It can be very well-settled that although taking into consideration the case of regular promotion of civil servants, the competent authority has got to consider the advantage of every check here one of the qualified candidates and after due deliberations, to grant promotion to these types of qualified candidates who are found to be most meritorious amongst them. Because the petitioner was held for being senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was dismissed through the respondent department just to increase favor to your blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy within the part of the respondent department.
Have you been looking for Court Information? You need to use our site to search to get a case or search for just a person. Information within the site is updated every 24 several hours at 3:00 am. Please Note: Name and Case information found to the search site is provided for use as reference material and isn't the official court record.
182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi As far as the stance of your respondents that pensionary benefits may very well be withheld on account on the allegations leveled against the petitioner, in our view, section twenty from the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does provide for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension can be withheld or reduced. These incorporate if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension may be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension may very well be withheld or reduced. In certain cases, a civil servant's pension may be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions established from the government.
These lists are sorted chronologically by Chief Justice and include things like all notable cases decided with the court. Articles exist for almost all cases.
Given that the Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has long been attained, therefore the decision on the Supreme Court needs to generally be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) of your Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming on the main case, it is also a properly-recognized proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is topic to your procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings about the evidence.